4.7 Review

Stem cell-based models of early mammalian development

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 149, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.201015

关键词

Blastoid; Embryogenesis; Embryoid; Gastruloid; Organogenesis; Stem cell

资金

  1. Michigan-Cambridge Research Initiative, National Institutes of Health [R21 NS113518, R21 HD100931, R21 HD105126, R21 HD105192, R21 HD109635, R01 GM143297]
  2. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1917304, CBET 1901718, PFI 2213845]
  3. 21st Century Jobs Trust Fund received through the Michigan Strategic Fund from the State of Michigan [CASE315037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of a zygote into an embryo is a miraculous process in nature, but scientists have struggled to understand the mechanisms in human embryos due to ethical and practical limitations. However, pluripotent stem cells have the ability to mimic specific embryonic events, allowing the creation of in vitro models that recapitulate different stages of early embryo development.
The complex process by which a single-celled zygote develops into a viable embryo is nothing short of a miraculous wonder of the natural world. Elucidating how this process is orchestrated in humans has long eluded the grasp of scientists due to ethical and practical limitations. Thankfully, pluripotent stem cells that resemble early developmental cell types possess the ability to mimic specific embryonic events. As such, murine and human stem cells have been leveraged by scientists to create in vitro models that aim to recapitulate different stages of early mammalian development. Here, we examine the wide variety of stem cell-based embryo models that have been developed to recapitulate and study embryonic events, from pre-implantation development through to early organogenesis. We discuss the applications of these models, key considerations regarding their importance within the field, and how such models are expected to growand evolve to achieve exciting new milestones in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据