4.3 Article

Rate and Characteristics of Incompletely Excised Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Dermatological Daily Practice Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

期刊

DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
卷 48, 期 12, 页码 1269-1273

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003606

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This prospective study investigated the rate and characteristics of incomplete excision of squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) in a dermatological setting. The results showed that the risk of incomplete excision of cSCC is low in a cohort dominated by low-risk cSCCs. Most incompletely excised cSCCs were high-risk types and the incompleteness was almost always at the deep margins. Therefore, special attention should be paid to the deep margins when dealing with high-risk cSCC, and microscopic surgery may be considered.
BACKGROUND Incomplete excision of squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is associated with an increased risk of recurrence, metastasis, and mortality. OBJECTIVE To determine the rate and characteristics of incompletely excised cSCC in a dermatological daily practice setting. METHODS Prospective study of all patients who gave informed consent, with a cSCC treated with standard excision (SE) at 1 of 6 Departments of Dermatology in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2017. Pathological reports were screened to detect all incompletely excised cSCCs. RESULTS A total of 592 patients with 679 cSCCs were included, whereby most cases were low risk cSCC (89%). The rate of incompletely excised cSCC was 4% (n = 26), and the majority were high-risk cSCCs of which 24 invaded the deep excision margin. CONCLUSION This prospective study showed that in a dermatological setting, the risk of an incompletely excised cSCC is low (4%) for a cohort that was dominated by low-risk cSCCs. Most incompletely excised cSCCs were of high risk, and incompleteness was almost always at the deep margins. These results suggest that for high-risk cSCC, one should pay attention especially to the deep margin when performing SE, and/or microscopic surgery should be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据