4.4 Review

Contribution of keratinocytes to dermal fibrosis

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 337-342

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000895

关键词

fibroblast; fibrosis; inflammation; keratinocyte; scleroderma

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [310030-159999]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cellular pathogenesis of fibrotic disorders remains speculative, but evidence suggests that keratinocytes may contribute to skin fibrosis.
Purpose of review The cellular pathogenesis of fibrotic disorders including systemic sclerosis (SSc) remains largely speculative. Currently, the altered function of endothelial cells and fibroblasts under the influence of an inappropriate immune response are considered central pathogenic events in SSc. Adding to this complexity, novel evidence here reviewed suggests that keratinocytes may concur in the development of skin fibrosis. Recent findings Epidermal equivalents (EE) generated from primary SSc keratinocytes display a distinct gene expression program when compared to healthy donor (HD) EE. SSc-EE, among others, exhibited enhanced oxidative and metabolic response pathways. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrated similarities between SSc-EE and SSc epidermis including altered keratinocyte differentiation, enhanced expression of activation markers, and reduced rate of basal keratinocytes proliferation. SSc-EE supernatants more than HD-EE modified the inflammatory and extracellular matrix deposition/resorption program of dermal fibroblasts. Further evidence indicated that the relative lack rather than the excess of interleukin-25 in keratinocytes may contribute to enhanced dermal fibrotic changes. Overall, these data support keratinocyte-intrinsic SSc-related modifications. Summary Improved methods for engineering epidermal and skin equivalents are helping to address the question whether keratinocyte alterations in SSc are primary and capable to dysregulate dermal homeostasis or secondary following dermal fibrotic changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据