4.5 Article

Evaluating target spot (Corynespora cassiicola) resistance in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) in a controlled environment

期刊

CROP PROTECTION
卷 159, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2022.106018

关键词

Target spot; Resistance

类别

资金

  1. Alabama Soybean Producers
  2. USDA-NIFA Hatch funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used a rapid screening technique to evaluate the resistance of 15 soybean varieties against target spot caused by Corynespora cassiicola. Two resistant varieties were identified, and some varieties showed resistance against different isolates of C. cassiicola. These resistant varieties could be used for further research on the resistance mechanisms of target spot.
Target spot, caused by the fungus Corynespora cassiicola, has been an increasing problem for soybean growers in the Mid-south and southeastern United States. With favorable environmental conditions, the disease causes premature defoliation and substantial yield losses; therefore, identifying resistant germplasm is critical. Herein, a rapid screening technique for target spot resistance was used to evaluate varieties for possible use in a breeding program. Fifteen soybean varieties, along with a known susceptible variety, were evaluated against isolate C. cassiicola LIM01. Two of the sixteen varieties were identified as resistant and nine were moderately suscep-tible. A subset of these was evaluated with three additional C. cassiicola isolates; these isolates differed in combinations of cassiicolin-encoding genes. The soybean varieties Bedford and Council were observed to be resistant to each of the C. cassiicola isolates tested in this study but need to be further validated in a field environment. Plant populations developed using these parent varieties could provide a foundation for QTL mapping of regions conferring resistance to target spot and identifying disease resistance mechanisms that can be transferred into elite soybean varieties through marker-assisted breeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据