4.6 Review

Ways to improve breast cancer patients' management and clinical outcome: The 2020 Assisi Think Tank Meeting

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103774

关键词

Breast cancer; Radiation therapy; De-escalating therapy; Stereotactic radiation therapy; Oligometastatic disease; BCRA-mutated patients; Contralateral breast cancer prevention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports on the third Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) on breast cancer, which aimed to identify key clinical questions and areas requiring research to improve management and outcomes. The meeting discussed three main topics and proposed research protocols to address clinical challenges in these areas.
We report on the third Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) on breast cancer, a brainstorming project which involved European radiation and clinical oncologists who were dedicated to breast cancer research and treatment. Held on February 2020, the ATTM aimed at identifying key clinical questions in current clinical practice and grey areas requiring research to improve management and outcomes. Before the meeting, three key topics were selected: 1) managing patients with frailty due to either age and/or multi-morbidity; 2) stereotactic ra-diation therapy and systemic therapy in the management of oligometastatic disease; 3) contralateral breast tumour prevention in BCRA-mutated patients. Clinical practice in these areas was investigated by means of an online questionnaire. In the lapse period between the survey and the meeting, the working groups reviewed data, on-going studies and the clinical challenges which were then discussed in-depth and subjected to intense brainstorming during the meeting; research protocols were also proposed. Methodology, outcome of discussions, conclusions and study proposals are summarized in the present paper. In conclusion, this report presents an in-depth analysis of the state of the art, grey areas and controversies in breast cancer radiation therapy and dis-cusses how to confront them in the absence of evidence-based data to guide clinical decision-making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据