4.7 Review

Microalgae/cyanobacteria: the potential green future of vitamin B12 production

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2130156

关键词

Arthrospira; B12; Chlorella; cobalamin; cyanobacteria; green microalgae

资金

  1. Internal Grand Agency of Mendel University in Brno [AF-IGA2022-IP-036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the available information about potential sources of vitamin B-12, especially for vegans or vegetarians and people in poor developing countries. Cyanobacteria and microalgae approved for food purposes can serve as promising and innovative sources of this vitamin. The review examines whether vitamin B-12 extracted from microalgae/cyanobacteria is biologically available to humans, with a specific focus on the genera Arthrospira and Chlorella. It also discusses the composition, cultivation requirements, and genetic properties of their biomass in B-12 production. Furthermore, the review explores the function of cobalamin in microalgae and cyanobacteria and the potential for modification and cocultivation to increase B-12 content in their biomass.
This review summarizes the available information about potential sources of vitamin B-12, especially for people who follow a vegan or vegetarian diet and inhabitants of poor countries in the developing world. Cyanobacteria and microalgae approved for food purposes can play a critical role as promising and innovative sources of this vitamin. This work involves a discussion of whether the form of vitamin B-12 extracted from microalgae/cyanobacteria is biologically available to humans, specifically focusing on the genera Arthrospira and Chlorella. It describes analyses of their biomass composition, cultivation requirements, and genetic properties in B-12 production. Furthermore, this review discusses the function of cobalamin in microalgae and cyanobacteria themselves and the possibility of modification and cocultivation to increase the content of B-12 in their biomass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据