4.7 Article

Durability properties of copper slag and coal bottom ash based I-shaped geopolymer paver blocks

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 347, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128461

关键词

Cost analysis; Durability properties; Geopolymerization; Geopolymer paver blocks; Industrial waste

资金

  1. Ministry of Education (MoE), GOI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a sustainable geopolymer paving block using copper slag and coal bottom ash as alternative materials. The geopolymer paving block showed improved properties in terms of water absorption, abrasion resistance, and chemical resistance compared to conventional paving blocks.
Geopolymer mortar was prepared with aluminate and silicate-bearing minerals with caustic activators like fly ash (FA), and copper slag (CS). The impression focused on the entire replacement of extensive and energy -intensive Portland cement and traditional natural fine aggregates with coal bottom ash and CS in manufacturing of sustainable geopolymer paving blocks suitable for both rural and urban infrastructure. The designed paver blocks were tested for various durability tests such as water absorption, chemical resistance, abrasion resistance, efflorescence and initial rate of absorption. In overall, the findings indicate the recom-mendation of geopolymer paving blocks containing 70% of CS and 30% of CBA with different concentrations of alkali activators. Also, the aforesaid geopolymer paver blocks, were found to be efficient compared to conven-tional (FA and PC) based paver blocks as the same were resulted in reduced water absorption (up to 15%). Similarly GPC mixes, resulted in better resistance (as the same were yielded up to 15% and 70%) against abrasion and chemical attack compared to conventional paver blocks respectively. Based on experimental findings, irrespective of the cost, the designed GPC mixes demonstrated excellent resistance towards aforementioned durability aspects compared to the conventional mix based paver blocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据