4.7 Article

Many-objective evolutionary algorithm based agricultural mobile robot route planning

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.107274

关键词

Route planning; Many -objective optimization; Agricultural mobile robot; Greenhouse

资金

  1. 2115 Talent Development Program of China Agricultural University, Overseas High-level Youth Talents Program (China Agricultural University, China) [62339001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agricultural robot technology has developed rapidly, and route planning plays a crucial role in reducing navigation distance and saving total turning angle. This study uses a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to solve the route planning problem for agricultural mobile robots, considering both path length and path angle. Four algorithms were compared, and HypE showed the best performance.
Agricultural robot technology has experienced rapid development in the past ten years, and agricultural robots have been used to implement various complex agricultural tasks. In these processes, route planning is an important guarantee for reducing navigation distance and saving total turning angle. However, minimizing the cost of the entire navigation process on the premise of completing agricultural work is difficult. Many-objective Evolutionary Algorithm is used to solve the route planning problem of agricultural mobile robots under the premise of minimizing navigation cost. By scanning the radar map of the greenhouse, the path between all target points is calculated by using the probabilistic roadmap (PRM), and the route planning of the agricultural robot is carried out according to the sum of the path length and the path angle. To determine the best route for agricultural mobile robots, four algorithms are compared: Hypervolume Estimation Algorithm (HypE), Grid-Based Evolutionary Algorithm (GrEA), Knee Point-Driven Evolutionary Algorithm (KnEA), and Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-III). The quality of the solutions was compared using C-Metric, and it could verify that HypE offers the best performance among four algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据