4.8 Article

A Highly Elastic and Rapidly Crosslinkable Elastin-Like Polypeptide-Based Hydrogel for Biomedical Applications

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 25, 期 30, 页码 4814-4826

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201501489

关键词

elasticity; elastin-like polypeptides; hydrogels; photocrosslinking

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Interdepartmental Biotechnology Training Program (NIH/NIGMS) [5T32GM008334]
  2. U.S. Army Research Office [W911NF-13-D-0001]
  3. German Heart Foundation, Frankfurt, Germany
  4. National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH) by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology [12-MED3096-3]
  5. National Science Foundation [EFRI-1240443]
  6. IMMODGEL [602694]
  7. National Institutes of Health [EB012597, AR057837, DE021468, HL099073, AI105024, AR063745]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs) are promising for biomedical applications due to their unique thermoresponsive and elastic properties. ELP-based hydrogels have been produced through chemical and enzymatic crosslinking or photocrosslinking of modified ELPs. Herein, a photocrosslinked ELP gel using only canonical amino acids is presented. The inclusion of thiols from a pair of cysteine residues in the ELP sequence allows disulfide bond formation upon exposure to UV light, leading to the formation of a highly elastic hydrogel. The physical properties of the resulting hydrogel such as mechanical properties and swelling behavior can be easily tuned by controlling ELP concentrations. The biocompatibility of the engineered ELP hydrogels is shown in vitro as well as corroborated in vivo with subcutaneous implantation of hydrogels in rats. ELP constructs demonstrate long-term structural stability in vivo, and early and progressive host integration with no immune response, suggesting their potential for supporting wound repair. Ultimately, functionalized ELPs demonstrate the ability to function as an in vivo hemostatic material over bleeding wounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据