4.6 Article

Multi-objective modeling of boiler combustion based on feature fusion and Bayesian optimization

期刊

COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107913

关键词

Boiler combustion model; Physical field; Feature fusion; CFD; XGBoost; Bayesian optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51976064, 52176006]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2020A1515010646]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2020ZYGXZR027]
  4. Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Efficient and Clean Energy Utilization [2013A061401005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel multi-objective prediction framework based on feature fusion is proposed for online combustion optimization of coal-fired boilers. By combining real-time physical field information, the model demonstrates improved prediction accuracy for thermal efficiency and NOx generation.
The physical field (temperature, gas concentration, etc.) inside the furnace is closely related to the boiler combustion optimization. A novel multi-objective prediction framework based on feature fusion is proposed to provide the basis for the online combustion optimization of coal-fired boilers. Firstly, the physical field information is obtained through the CFD, which presented a strong correlation between thermal efficiency and NOx generation. Then the eXtreme Gradient Boosting and Bayesian Optimization are used to construct the model according to the changes of the real-time physical field and operating conditions. The modeling results demonstrated that the prediction accuracy of thermal efficiency from the model with the fusion information can be improved by 1.49% compared with the model using the operational data. The prediction accuracy of thermal efficiency and NOx generation is improved by 2.57% and 0.13%, respectively, which indicated that the expression ability of the model improved by combing the typical real-time physical field information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据