4.7 Article

Three-dimensional phase-field modeling of brittle fracture using an adaptive octree-based scaled boundary finite element approach

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.115364

关键词

Phase -field method; Adaptivity; Octree decomposition; Three-dimensional fracture; Scaled boundary finite element method

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [444616865]
  2. DAAD-PPP (India) Schemes
  3. Department of Science and Technology, India
  4. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An adaptive phase-field approach is proposed for three-dimensional fracture modeling in brittle materials. The scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) is used to solve the equations, and the accuracy of the solution is ensured using an error indicator and a phase-field evolution criterion. The computational cost is reduced by exploiting the geometric similarity of cells in balanced octree meshes.
In this paper, an adaptive phase-field approach is proposed for three-dimensional fracture modeling in brittle materials. The scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) is used to solve the phase-field and elasticity equations in a staggered scheme. This is motivated by the ability of the SBFEM to handle polyhedral elements with hanging nodes straightforwardly. Such elements occur in octree meshes, which facilitate rapid transitions in element size and lend themselves to adaptive refinement. The SBFEM also provides an energy-based error indicator, which follows directly from the semi-analytical solution approach and does not require stress recovery. The error indicator is used to ensure the solution accuracy for both fields and combined with a criterion based on phase-field evolution. The computational cost associated with 3D fracture modeling is further reduced by exploiting the geometric similarity of cells occurring in balanced octree meshes. To validate the proposed method, several classical benchmark problems are solved, resulting in efficient and robust solutions compared to the literature.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据