4.7 Article

Three-field floating projection topology optimization of continuum structures

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.115444

关键词

Topology optimization; Implicit floating projection constraint; Robust formulation; Shell-infill structures

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP210103523]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a three-field floating projection topology optimization (FPTO) method using linear material interpolation. The method enhances the formation of structural topology and can be extended to robust formulation. The effectiveness and advantage of the proposed method are demonstrated through numerical examples.
Topology optimization using the variable substitution among three fields can achieve a design with desired solid and/or void features. This paper proposes a three-field floating projection topology optimization (FPTO) method using the linear material interpolation. The implicit floating projection constraint is used as an engine for generating a 0/1 solution at the design field. The substitution filtering and projection schemes enhance the length scale and solid/void features to accelerate the formation of structural topology in the physical field. Meanwhile, the three-field FPTO method can be extended to robust formulation, which obtains the eroded, intermediate, and dilated designs with the same topology. The most distinct feature of the FPTO method lies in the adoption of the linear material interpolation scheme, which makes many topology optimization problems straightforward. As an example, the proposed three-field FPTO algorithm is further applied to the design of shell-infill structures using the linear multi-material interpolation scheme. The distribution of the shell material is generated through a simple filtering scheme, and the shell thickness is accurately controlled by the filter radius. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and advantage of the proposed three-field FPTO method. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据