4.5 Article

Assessment of reporting completeness in acupuncture studies on patients with functional constipation using the STRICTA guidelines

期刊

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2022.102849

关键词

Acupuncture; Completeness of Reporting; Functional Constipation; Clinical trial

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China, China [2018YFC1705700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The completeness of reporting acupuncture interventions for functional constipation in accordance with STRICTA guidelines is moderate, with poor adherence to the guidelines for several items. Clinical trial reports should be improved to enhance the completeness of evidence, and efforts should be made to explore the reasons behind the lack of reporting and develop strategies for improving guideline compliance.
Objective: To evaluate the completeness of reporting of acupuncture interventions in trials for functional con-stipation (FC) following the STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) guidelines. Methods: We searched eight databases for all published trials, including clinical trials, pilot/feasibility studies, observational studies, and case studies, for acupuncture in patients with FC up to June 31, 2021. The completeness of reporting was evaluated using the STRICTA guidelines. Results: Finally, 99 studies were included and analysed based on the latest STRICTA guidelines. Out of the 17 analysed STRICTA sub-items, only five were found to be appropriately reported in more than 90% of the trials, while five were completely reported in less than 30%. Conclusions: The reporting completeness of acupuncture trials for FC in accordance with STRICTA guidelines is moderate, with poor guideline adherence for several items. Clinical trial reports should be further improved in accordance with STRICTA guidelines to enhance the completeness of evidence. There is also a need to explore the underlying reasons as to why the authors did not report these items and to develop strategies for improving guideline compliance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据