4.6 Article

In situ growth of graphitic carbon nitride on multiwalled carbon nanotubes for interfacial thermal management

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129232

关键词

Carbon Nitride; Self-assembly; Interfaces; Nanocomposites; Thermal Conductivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51973016, 51873019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents a simple method for the in situ growth of graphitic carbon nitride on the surface of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. The introduction of carbon nitride improves the interfacial properties of the carbon nanotubes, enhancing both thermal conductivity and electrical insulation. This is highly beneficial for interfacial thermal management applications that require high thermal conductivity and electrical insulation properties.
This work reports a facile method for in situ growth of graphitic carbon nitride (CN) on surface of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs), which was performed via the self-assembly of molecular precursors of CN on CNTs and subsequent calcination step. The self-assembly was directed by the hydrogen bonds formed between amino groups of Melamine and carboxyl units of CNTs. After polycondensation reaction, CN nanostructures grew homogeneously on surface of CNTs possibly linked by covalent bonds. The incorporation of CN improved the interfacial properties of CNTs by increasing the functional groups and wettability, which could promote the dispersion of CNTs in polymer matrix and enhance the heat conductive capacity. Accordingly, the obtained thermal conductive silicon grease involving CNTs/CN nanocomposites showed an enhancement in thermal conductivity at a loading amount of CN (~ 8%). Meanwhile, the insulation resistance of the nanocomposites increased significantly with the dose amount of CN due to its semi-conductivity. Therefore, the obtained CNTs/ CN nanocomposites were suitable for interfacial thermal management that require high thermal conductivity and electrically insulative properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据