4.6 Article

Synthesis of silica nanofibers-supported BiOCl/TiO2 heterojunction composites with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic performance

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129798

关键词

Photocatalysis; BiOCl; TiO2; Heterojunction; Silica nanofibers

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774330]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2022ZZTS0423]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents a novel ternary composite BiOCl/TiO2/silica nanofibers (BTS) with enhanced photocatalytic performance for organic wastewater treatment. The composition of BTS allows for superior degradation of rhodamine B compared to bare BiOCl or TiO2, as well as TiO2/silica nanofibers (TS). The main active species in the reaction system were found to be superoxide radical anions (CT).
Heterogeneous photocatalysts with high catalytic performance and recyclability have attracted widespread attention in organic wastewater treatment. In the study, we designed and synthesized a novel ternary BiOCl/TiO2/silica nanofibers (BTS) composite with enhanced photocatalytic performance via a modified sol-gel method and precipitation/calcination method. In the composite, BiOCl nanosheets and TiO2 nanoparticles are uniformly dispersed on the surface of silica nanofibers in turn, where they are closely combined to form BiOCl/TiO2 heterojunction structure. The composite displays superior degradation performance for rhodamine B (RhB) than bare BiOCl or TiO2 as well as TiO2/silica nanofibers (TS). The excellent photocatalytic performance of BTS is mainly attributed to the enhanced dispersibility of BiOCl and TiO2 given by SNF and the effective construction of BiOCl/TiO2 heterojunction. The radical scavenger and EPR tests found that superoxide radical anions (CT) are the dominant active species in the reaction system. It is proposed that the BTS composite shows great potential for wide application in the field of sewage treatment driven by solar energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据