4.7 Review

The therapeutic potential of bone marrow-derived macrophages in neurological diseases

期刊

CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 1942-1952

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cns.13964

关键词

bone marrow transplantation; dysfunctional microglia; gene delivery; gene therapy; macrophage; monocyte

资金

  1. Swedish Governmental grants to scientists working in health care [ALFGBG-965197]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [U21A20347]
  3. Swedish Cancer Foundation [20-1121-PjF]
  4. Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation [PR2018-0082, PR2021-0020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Circulating monocytes can transform into bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) and play important roles in the central nervous system (CNS). Modulating BMDMs may be a way to treat neurological diseases, and BMDMs can serve as gene delivery vehicles after bone marrow transplantation. Understanding the roles of BMDMs in CNS diseases and their potential as gene delivery vehicles provides new opportunities for therapeutic interventions.
Circulating monocytes are precursors of both tissue macrophages and dendritic cells, and they can infiltrate the central nervous system (CNS) where they transform into bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs). BMDMs play essential roles in various CNS diseases, thus modulating BMDMs might be a way to treat these disorders because there are currently no efficient therapeutic methods available for most of these neurological diseases. Moreover, BMDMs can serve as promising gene delivery vehicles following bone marrow transplantation for otherwise incurable genetic CNS diseases. Understanding the distinct roles that BMDMs play in CNS diseases and their potential as gene delivery vehicles may provide new insights and opportunities for using BMDMs as therapeutic targets or delivery vehicles. This review attempts to comprehensively summarize the neurological diseases that might be treated by modulating BMDMs or by delivering gene therapies via BMDMs after bone marrow transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据