4.2 Article

Monitoring the Awake and Anesthetized Unconscious States Using Bispectral Index and Electroencephalographic Connectivity Measures

期刊

CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 273-280

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15500594221131680

关键词

electroencephalogram (EEG); bispectral index (BIS); directed transfer function (DTF); anesthesia; consciousness; Trial; case number 2012; 2015

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared three EEG-based methods with anesthesiologist clinical judgment of awake and anesthetized unconscious states. The results showed that bilateral BIS method had the highest accuracy and lowest false positive rate, while entropy scored lower on accuracy and higher on false positive rate. Therefore, it is recommended to combine BIS and DTF methods to assess anesthesia state.
Objective. Our objective was to compare three electroencephalography (EEG)-based methods with anesthesiologist clinical judgment of the awake and anesthetized unconscious states. Methods. EEG recorded from 25 channels and from four channel bilateral Bispectral index (BIS) electrodes were collected from 20 patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia. To measure connectivity we applied Directed Transfer Function (DTF) in eight channels of the EEG, and extracted data from BIS over the same time segments. Shannon's entropy was applied to assess the complexity of the EEG signal. Discriminant analysis was used to evaluate the data in relation to clinical judgment. Results. Assessing anesthetic state relative clinical judgment, the bilateral BIS gave the highest accuracy (ACC) (95.4%) and lowest false positive discovery rate (FDR) (0.5%) . Equivalent DTF gave 94.5% for ACC and 2.6% for FDR. Combining all methods gave ACC = 94.9% and FDR = 1%. Generally, entropy scored lower on ACC and higher on FDR than the other methods (ACC 90.87% and FDR 4.6%). BIS showed at least a one minute delay in 18 of the 20 patients. Conclusions. Our results show that BIS and DTF both have a high ACC and low FDR. Because of time delays in BIS values, we recommend combining the two methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据