4.8 Review

The pentraxins PTX3 and SAP in innate immunity, regulation of inflammation and tissue remodelling

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 64, 期 6, 页码 1416-1427

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.02.029

关键词

Pentraxin; Innate immunity; Inflammation; Pattern recognition molecules; Clinical biomarker

资金

  1. European Commission (ERC-PHII) [280873]
  2. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca (MIUR) [FIRB RBAP11H2R9]
  3. Ministero della Salute [RF-2011-02348358, GR-2011-02349539]
  4. Cluster Alisei (MEDINTECH) [CTN01_00177_962865]
  5. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pentraxins are a superfamily of fluid phase pattern recognition molecules conserved in evolution and characterized by a cyclic multimeric structure. C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid P component (SAP) constitute the short pentraxin arm of the superfamily. CRP and SAP are produced in the liver in response to IL-6 and are acute phase reactants in humans and mice respectively. In addition SAP has been shown to affect tissue remodelling and fibrosis by stabilizing all types of amyloid fibrils and by regulating monocyte to fibrocyte differentiation. Pentraxin 3 (PTX3) is the prototype of the long pentraxin arm. Gene targeted mice and genetic and epigenetic studies in humans suggest that PTX3 plays essential non-redundant roles in innate immunity and inflammation as well as in tissue remodelling. Recent studies have revealed the role of PTX3 as extrinsic oncosuppressor, able to tune cancer-related inflammation. In addition, at acidic pH PTX3 can interact with provisional matrix components promoting inflammatory matrix remodelling. Thus acidification during tissue repair sets PTX3 in a tissue remodelling and repair mode, suggesting that matrix and microbial recognition are common, ancestral features of the humoral arm of innate immunity. (C) 2016 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据