4.7 Article

Zinc iron selenide nanoflowers anchored g-C3N4 as advanced catalyst for photocatalytic water splitting and dye degradation

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 307, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135937

关键词

Carbon nitride; Iron selenides; Photocatalyst; Water splitting; Zinc selenides

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2020R1I1A3054429]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study synthesized a nanocomposite of transition metal selenide and g-C3N4 for photocatalytic water splitting. The nanocomposite exhibited high rates of hydrogen and oxygen evolution, as well as enhanced photocatalytic degradation of a dye compound.
Hydrogen has been considered as a promising clean energy source owing to its renewability and zero carbon emission. Accordingly, photocatalytic water splitting has drawn much attention as a key green technology of producing hydrogen. However, it has remained as a great challenge due to the low production rate and expensive constituents of photocatalytic systems. Herein, we synthesised nanostructures consisting of transition metal selenide and g-C3N4 for photocatalytic water splitting reaction. They include ZnSe, FeSe2, Zn/FeSe2 and ZnFeSe2 nanoflowers and a nanocomposite made of Zn/FeSe2 and g-C3N4. Hydrogen evolution rates in the presence of ZnSe, FeSe2, Zn/FeSe(2 )and ZnFeSe2 photocatalysts were measured as 60.03, 128.02, 155.11 and 83.59 mu molg(-1) min(-1), respectively. On the other hand, with the nanocomposite consisting of Zn/FeSe2 and g-C3N4, the hydrogen and oxygen evolution rates were significantly enhanced up to 202.94 mu mol g(-1) min(-1) and 90.92 mu mol g(-1 )min(-1), respectively. The nanocomposite was also examined as a photocatalyst for degradation of rhodamine B showing that it photodegrades the compound two times faster compared to pristine Zn/FeSe2 nanoflowers without g-C3N4. Our study suggests the nanocomposite of Zn/FeSe2 and g-C3N4 as a promising photocatalyst for energy and environmental applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据