4.7 Article

Synergistic effect of atomically dispersed Fe-Ni pair sites for electrocatalytic reactions to remove chlorinated organic compounds

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 303, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134992

关键词

Double-atom catalyst; Electrocatalysis; Active site; Chlorinated organic pollutant

资金

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China [8222061]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52070015, 21872009]
  3. Beijing Forestry University Outstanding Young Talent Cultivation Project [2019JQ03007]
  4. Beijing Municipal Education Commission through the Innovative Transdisciplinary Program Ecological Restoration Engineering [GJJXK210102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study confirms the high efficiency of the diatomic catalyst FeNi/N-rGO in degrading organic pollutants, showing great potential for playing a significant role in environmental protection.
Electrocatalysis is a promising and environmentally friendly technology for the removal of refractory organics. Diatomic catalysts with an increased number of active sites have emerged with further expansion of the field of atomic catalysts. Here, a metal diatomic FeNi supported graphene (FeNi/N-rGO) catalyst is successfully synthesized. The atomically dispersed Fe and Ni species on graphene is verified by aberration-corrected high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy and X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy. The pollutant degradation efficiencies for the cathode and anode are found to reach 97.6% and 95.8%, respectively, within 90 min in the diatomic catalytic system. According to DFT theoretical calculations, FeNi diatomic catalysts have a lower free energy (Delta G = -0.2 eV), and the higher adsorption energy for the active substance H* is -0.412 eV. This work presents a method for the preparation of high-performance diatomic catalysts and promotes their application in the electrochemical degradation of chlorinated organic pollutants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据