4.5 Article

Effects of the 5′-Triphosphate Metabolites of Ribavirin, Sofosbuvir, Vidarabine, and Molnupiravir on CTP Synthase Catalysis and Filament Formation: Implications for Repurposing Antiviral Agents against SARS-CoV-2

期刊

CHEMMEDCHEM
卷 17, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.202200399

关键词

CTP synthase; antiviral; inhibition kinetics; activation; filaments

资金

  1. NSHA Research & Innovation (Nova Scotia Health)
  2. Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation
  3. QEII Health Sciences Centre Foundation
  4. IWK Foundation
  5. IWK Health Centre
  6. Dartmouth General Hospital Foundation
  7. Research Nova Scotia
  8. MITACS Research Training Grant
  9. NSERC CREATE Training Program in BioActives [510963]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Repurposed antiviral drugs have the potential to affect the activity of a critical pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthetic enzyme.
Repurposing of antiviral drugs affords a rapid and effective strategy to develop therapies to counter pandemics such as COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 replication is closely linked to the metabolism of cytosine-containing nucleotides, especially cytidine-5 '-triphosphate (CTP), such that the integrity of the viral genome is highly sensitive to intracellular CTP levels. CTP synthase (CTPS) catalyzes the rate-limiting step for the de novo biosynthesis of CTP. Hence, it is of interest to know the effects of the 5 '-triphosphate (TP) metabolites of repurposed antiviral agents on CTPS activity. Using E. coli CTPS as a model enzyme, we show that ribavirin-5 '-TP is a weak allosteric activator of CTPS, while sofosbuvir-5 '-TP and adenine-arabinofuranoside-5 '-TP are both substrates. beta-d-N-4-Hydroxycytidine-5 '-TP is a weak competitive inhibitor relative to CTP, but induces filament formation by CTPS. Alternatively, sofosbuvir-5 '-TP prevented CTP-induced filament formation. These results reveal the underlying potential for repurposed antivirals to affect the activity of a critical pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthetic enzyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据