4.6 Article

The Sulfur Rich Fluorothiophosphate Dianions [S5P2F2]2- and [S3PF]2- : Cluster and Chelation Control of P-S Heterolysis

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 28, 期 65, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202202026

关键词

cadmium cluster; chelate; copper cluster; difluoropentathiodiphosphate; zinc; fluorotrithiophosphate

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. CRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes the synthesis and structural characterization of [S5P2F2](2-) and its reactions with metal ions such as zinc, cadmium, and copper. The results show a diverse array of binding modes and structural motifs, which are relevant to understanding multimetal binding to metallothionines and potential capping strategies for CdS and CdSe nanoparticles.
The sulfur rich difluoropentathiodiphosphate dianion [S5P2F2](2-), from fluoride addition to P4S10, has a somewhat checkered history and proves to be the main product of the reaction in acetonitrile. Its optimized synthesis, and structural characterization, as either a tetraphenylphosphonium or a tetrapropylammonium salt, [(NPr4)-Pr-n](2)[S5P2F2] allows for the first coordination chemistry for this dianion. Reactions of [S5P2F2](2-) with d(10) metal ions of zinc(II), and cadmium(II), and d(9) copper(II) resulted in a surprising diverse array of binding modes and structural motifs. In addition to the simple bis-chelate coordination of [S5P2F2](2-) with zinc, cleavage of the P-S bond resulted in complexes with the unusual [S3PF](2-) fluorotrithiophosphate dianion. This was observed in two cluster complexes: a trinuclear cadmium complex with mixed [S5P2F2](2-)/[S3PF](2-) ligands, [Cd-3(S5P2F2)(3)(S3PF)(2)](4-) as well as an octanuclear copper cluster, [Cu-8(S3PF)(6)](4-) which form rapidly at room temperature. These new metal/sulfur/ligand clusters are of relevance to understanding multimetal binding to metallothionines, and to potential capping strategies for the condensed nanoparticulate cadmium chalcogenide semiconductors CdS and CdSe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据