4.6 Article

Access to Enantiomerically Pure P-Stereogenic Primary Aminophosphine Sulfides under Reductive Conditions

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 28, 期 72, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202202608

关键词

alkali metals; cleavage reactions; phosphorus; P-stereogenic compounds; structure elucidation

资金

  1. Elite Network of Bavaria (ENB)
  2. Bavarian State Ministry of Science and the Arts (StMWK)
  3. University of Regensburg [N-LW-NW-2016-366]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This passage discusses a novel class of phosphines, synthesized enantiomerically pure primary aminophosphine sulfides through stereospecific reductive C-N bond cleavage of phosphorus(V) precursors by lithium in liquid ammonia, and investigates their chemoselectivity. The absolute configurations of all P-stereogenic compounds were determined, with their use as synthetic building blocks demonstrated.
Stereochemically pure phosphines with phosphorus-heteroatom bonds and P-centered chirality are a promising class of functional building blocks for the design of chiral ligands and organocatalysts. A route to enantiomerically pure primary aminophosphine sulfides was opened through stereospecific reductive C-N bond cleavage of phosphorus(V) precursors by lithium in liquid ammonia. The chemoselectivity of the reaction as a function of reaction time, substrate pattern, and chiral auxiliary was investigated. In the presence of exclusively aliphatic groups bound to the phosphorus atom, all competing reductive side reactions are totally prevented. The absolute configurations of all P-stereogenic compounds were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Their use as synthetic building blocks was demonstrated. The lithium salt of (R)-BINOL-dithiophosphoric acid proved to be a useful stereochemical probe to determine the enantiomeric purity. Insights into the coordination mode of the lithium-based chiral complex formed in solution was provided by NMR spectroscopy and DFT calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据