4.8 Article

Rock-Salt-Ordered Nitrohalide Double Antiperovskites: Theoretical Design and Experimental Verification

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 34, 期 20, 页码 9098-9103

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01925

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  2. [51972130]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the theoretical design and experimental verification of rock-salt-ordered double antiperovskites with reduced bandgaps. The results demonstrate strategies for designing double antiperovskites and expanding their applications.
Motivated by the success of metal halide perovskites in the field of optoelectronics, antiperovskites, which have the same crystal lattice as that of perovskites but with switched anion and cation positions, have recently been considered as potential candidates for optoelectronic applications. However, the best-known oxyhalide antiperovskites A(3)OX (A = alkali metal; X = halogen) generally exhibit very large bandgaps due to their immensely strong ionicity. In this work, we report the theoretical design and experimental verification of rock-salt-ordered double antiperovskites with reduced bandgaps. Each of two O anions in the A(3)OX oxyhalide antiperovskites is replaced with the combination of a trivalent N anion and a monovalent Y '' anion, yielding A(6)NY '' X-2 double antiperovskites. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal that compared with the A(3)OX antiperovskites, the A(6)NY '' X-2 double antiperovskites have significantly reduced bandgaps, mainly due to high-lying N 2p orbitals. On the other hand, the p orbitals of the Y '' anion lie far below the N 2p orbitals and almost do not affect the bandgaps. Guided by the DFT calculations, we successfully synthesized four nitrohalide double antiperovskites, that is, Li6NBrBr2, Li6NBrBr2, Li6NClBr2, and Li6NBrI2, and verified the predicted bandgap reductions. Our work provides strategies for designing double antiperovskites and expands the large family of antiperovskites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据