4.8 Review

Molecular-Modified Photocathodes for Applications in Artificial Photosynthesis and Solar-to-Fuel Technologies

期刊

CHEMICAL REVIEWS
卷 122, 期 21, 页码 16051-16109

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00200

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1653982]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0021186]
  3. Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Awards Program
  4. IGERT-SUN fellowships - National Science Foundation [1144616]
  5. Phoenix Chapter of the ARCS Foundation
  6. Heiwa Nakajima Foundation
  7. Division Of Chemistry
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1653982] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0021186] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review article highlights the principles of natural and artificial photosynthesis, and compares their solar energy transduction processes. The biological approach uses abundant elements and molecular interfaces to drive photoinduced charge separation reactions, while the artificial systems utilize hybrid photocathodes to power fuel-forming reactions with molecular catalysts.
Nature offers inspiration for developing technologies that integrate the capture, conversion, and storage of solar energy. In this review article, we highlight principles of natural photosynthesis and artificial photosynthesis, drawing comparisons between solar energy transduction in biology and emerging solar-to-fuel technologies. Key features of the biological approach include use of earth-abundant elements and molecular interfaces for driving photoinduced charge separation reactions that power chemical transformations at global scales. For the artificial systems described in this review, emphasis is placed on advancements involving hybrid photocathodes that power fuel-forming reactions using molecular catalysts interfaced with visible-light-absorbing semiconductors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据