4.5 Article

Adsorption and sensing performances of Rh-embedded PtSe2 monolayer upon CO and HCHO in dry-type reactors: A first-principles study

期刊

CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 562, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2022.111652

关键词

Rh-PtSe2 monolayer; Gas sensing; Dry-type reactors; First-principle theory

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project of State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Company, China [KJ22- 1-36]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on the first-principles method, this paper theoretically analyzes the Rh-embedded PtSe2 monolayer as a potential gas sensor for detection of CO and HCHO in dry-type reactors to evaluate their operation status. The results show that the Rh-PtSe2 monolayer can be a promising sensor with good response or selectivity for detecting the two gas species.
Based on the first-principles method, we theoretically analyze the Rh-embedded PtSe2 (Rh-PtSe2) monolayer as a potential gas sensor in this paper, for detection of CO and HCHO in the dry-type reactor to evaluate its operation status. The Rh-embedding behavior is performed by substituting a Se atom at the topmost Se layer of the pristine PtSe2 monolayer, and we find that the Rh atom can be stably and energy-favorably embedded in the PtSe2 monolayer with the formation energy (E-form) of -0.53 eV. Chemisorption is identified for the CO and HCHO system, with the adsorption energy (E-ad) as -1.89 and -1.05 eV, respectively. The electronic property analysis reveals that the Rh-PtSe2 monolayer can be a promising resistance-type sensor or a field-effect transistor sensor for detection of two gas species, with good sensing response or selectivity. This theoretical work can pave the way to further investigate the sensing application of Rh-PtSe2 monolayer upon toxic gases in the dry-type reactors, and related experimental research can verify our findings and to confirm that Rh-PtSe2 monolayer is a promising sensing candidate to evaluate the operation status of the dry-type reactors in the power system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据