4.4 Article

Synthesis of ethyl levulinate from furfuryl alcohol using waste yeast/sulfonic acid heterogeneous catalyst system

期刊

CHEMICAL PAPERS
卷 76, 期 12, 页码 7535-7544

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11696-022-02405-8

关键词

Sulfonated yeast; Furfuryl alcohol; Ethyl levulinate; Heterogeneous acid catalysis

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFC2101100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a functionalized, heterogeneous, and insoluble acid catalyst of yeast-sulfonic acid was prepared and characterized for its high catalytic activity. The catalyzed reaction of furfuryl alcohol to produce ethyl levulinate showed significant impact of catalyst amount and reaction conditions on the yield and conversion rate, with a proposed reaction mechanism presented.
In this study, a functionalized, heterogeneous, and insoluble acid catalyst of yeast-sulfonic acid was prepared by simple steps using spent yeast and sulfonic acid as raw materials. Its unique internal microstructure and abundant sulfonic acid groups on the surface endow it with the properties of Bronsted acid and high-performance activity. The catalyst was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, Barrett-Emmett-Teller N-2 adsorption-desorption analysis, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. The catalyzed synthesis of ethyl levulinate (EL) from furfuryl alcohol (FA) was carried out at a temperature of 120 degrees C for 2 h. The conversion rate and yield percentages for the catalyzed reaction of FA to produce EL were 98.2 and 94.7%, respectively. The results show that the amount of catalyst used and reaction conditions significantly impacted the EL yield and FA conversion rate. Overall, the possible reaction mechanism for the conversion of FA to EL was proposed. It was found that the main reason for the high catalytic activity of the catalyst was the effect of Bronsted acid sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据