4.6 Article

Theoretical insights into the oxygen supply performance of a-Fe2O3 in the chemical-looping reforming of methane

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 262, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.118041

关键词

Methane; Syngas; a-Fe2O3; Oxygen carrier; Oxygen migration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [22038011, 22078257, 22108213]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018T111034, 2021M692548]
  3. Rising Star Program in Science and Tech-nology of Shaanxi Province [2020KJXX-079]
  4. K. C. Wong Education Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the oxygen migration properties of oxygen carriers (OCs) and the matching problem of oxygen migration rate with the methane dissociation rate were investigated using theoretical analysis. It was found that the migration rate of lattice oxygen and the dissociation of methane can be well matched at a low surface oxygen vacancy concentration, which is crucial for the selective production of syngas.
The chemical looping reforming of methane to syngas is of great significance to the sustainable development of energy and environment, where the oxygen carrier (OC) is the core element of this technology. To study the oxygen migration properties of OCs and the matching problem of oxygen migration rate with the surface catalytic reaction rate, we present a theoretical study by taking the abundant and cheap alpha-Fe2O3 as the model OC. It is found that the migration rate of lattice oxygen and the dissociation of methane will be enhanced as the concentration of surface oxygen vacancy increases. By comparing the oxygen migration rate with the methane dissociation rate, we reveal that the two rates can match well at a low surface oxygen vacancy concentration, which is the key to the selective production of syngas. Lower or higher surface oxygen vacancy concentration will lead to the products towards carbon dioxide or coke. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据