4.6 Article

Electrochemical study of reduced graphene oxide@Zn2Ti3O8 nanocomposites as a superior anode for Li-ion battery

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.117872

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; Anode; 2D nanocomposite; Zn2Ti3O8; Pseudocapacitance

资金

  1. Keypoint Research and Invention in Shaanxi Province of China [2020GY-270]
  2. Service local special plan project of Education Department of Shaanxi Province [19JC009]
  3. Shaanxi Foreign Experts Service Program [2022WGZJ-25]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully synthesized a high-performance lithium-ion battery anode material with excellent rate performance, cycling stability, and reversible capacity. The novel nanocomposite exhibits outstanding performance at high current densities, which is of significant importance for the technological advancement of lithium-ion batteries.
In this paper, a high-performance Li-ion battery anode, 2D reduced graphene oxide@Zn2Ti3O8 nanocomposite was successfully synthesized. In the mixing process, the porous Zn2Ti3O8 nanoplate and the reduced graphene oxide flakes were closely bonded by the electrostatic force, and then the heterojunction formed between them after 600 ? heat treatment in the N-2 atmosphere. Due to the introduction of graphene, the electrochemical impedance of the composite is much reduced, and this two-dimensional heterostructure induced a large number of pseudocapacitance behaviors, which greatly increased the rate performance, cycling stability, and reversible capacity. In the long cycle performance tests at high current densities, the reduced graphene oxide@Zn2Ti3O8 composite can maintain stable capacities of 600 mAh g(-1 )at 1000 mA g(-1)and 265 mAh g(-1) at 5000 mA g(-1), exceeding all previous reports of Zn2Ti3O8 electrode. The excellent performance of the nanocomposite under high current density makes it a potential anode material for lithium-ion batteries. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据