4.6 Article

The future of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation in the chemical process industries

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 299-305

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2022.09.021

关键词

Computation; DEM; Process design; Scale-up; CFD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Computer-based simulation plays a significant role in the Chemical Process Industries (CPIs) by simulating complex physics and chemistry, developing validated models, and scaling up or down processes for optimization and control. The focus is on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Discrete Element Modeling (DEM) which are essential for simulating fluid flow and particles. Drawing from past experiences, valuable lessons can be learned to identify current and future trends, and provide guidance for companies to integrate this technology into their design processes. The future of simulation appears promising for both academia and industry, especially for users with strong computational skills.
Computer-based simulation is a huge contributor to the understanding of processes be-cause of the ability to simulate complex physics and chemistry, develop validated models and then use them in the scale-up and, more recently, the scale-down of processes, as well as process optimisation and control. Almost all processes in the Chemical Process Industries (CPIs) involve fluid flow or particles, so here we will focus on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Discrete Element Modelling (DEM). Through my experience of computer modelling and supporting simulation groups over the last 40 years, I seek to draw out important lessons from the past to identify current and future trends, as well as to provide advice to help companies imbed this technology in their design processes. I see a very bright future for simulation and users with good computational skills in both academia and industry.(c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据