4.7 Article

Evolution of cooperation driven by diversity on a double-layer square lattice

期刊

CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112462

关键词

Cooperation; Mixed games; Diversity; Two-layer networks

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [72101174, 12101447]
  2. Humanity and Social Science Youth foundation of Ministry of Education of China [21YJCZH179, 19YJCZH174]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the impact of diversity on the spread of cooperation and finds that diversity, regardless of its origin, promotes the diffusion of cooperative behaviors. The diversity of individual internal attributes is more conducive to the formation of cooperative behaviors, and the influence of asymmetry on the results is discussed.
Understanding the potential promotion mechanism for the formation and maintenance of cooperation is a pivotal issue in the development of human society and the natural world. Evolutionary games provide a forceful theoretical tool to probe into the essence of cooperative behaviors. It is considered that diversity (heterogeneity) is a common attribute of individuals and their interaction environment. We explore the propagation of cooperation under the influence of diversity and identify the similarities and discrepancies in the impact of internal and external sources of heterogeneity. The results show that heterogeneity, regardless of its origin, can promote the diffusion of cooperative behaviors. However, our researches further demonstrate that diversity of individual internal attributes is more conducive to the formation of cooperative behaviors than environmental heterogeneity. Moreover, we discuss the impact of asymmetry on the results and verify the robustness of the conclusions in different mixed game models. Our explorations shed some light on the promotion mechanism of cooperation from the perspective of sources of heterogeneity and highlight the role of diversity in the spread of altruistic behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据