4.6 Article

High cortical iron is associated with the disruption of white matter tracts supporting cognitive function in healthy older adults

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 4815-4828

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac382

关键词

quantitative susceptibility mapping; aging; brain iron; demyelination; oxidative stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that brain iron concentration is associated with the disruption of white matter microstructure in cognitive brain networks, with high iron concentration being linked to lower neurite density.
Aging is associated with brain iron accumulation, which has been linked to cognitive decline. However, how brain iron affects the structure and function of cognitive brain networks remains unclear. Here, we explored the possibility that iron load in gray matter is associated with disruption of white matter (WM) microstructure within a network supporting cognitive function, in a cohort of 95 cognitively normal older adults (age range: 60-86). Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to localize a set of brain regions involved in working memory and diffusion tensor imaging based probabilistic tractography was used to identify a network of WM tracts connecting the functionally defined regions. Brain iron concentration within these regions was evaluated using quantitative susceptibility mapping and microstructural properties were assessed within the identified tracts using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging. Results indicated that high brain iron concentration was associated with low neurite density (ND) within the task-relevant WM network. Further, regional associations were observed such that brain iron in cortical regions was linked with lower ND in neighboring but not distant WM tracts. Our results provide novel evidence suggesting that age-related increases in brain iron concentration are associated with the disruption of WM tracts supporting cognitive function in normal aging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据