4.7 Article

Microwave sintering of dense and lattice 3Y-TZP samples shaped by digital light processing

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 7350-7358

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.194

关键词

Zirconia; Digital light processing; Microwave; Densification; Microstructure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays, ceramic parts with solid and complex shapes can be produced using rapid and efficient shaping and sintering techniques. This study utilized Digital Light Processing (DLP) for shaping and conventional (CV) and microwave (MW) sintering to produce 3mol% yttria stabilized zirconia (3Y-TZP) dense and lattice parts. MW sintering of 3Y-TZP samples with different heating rates and CV sintering were conducted, resulting in high final densities for both dense and lattice MW-sintered samples.
Nowadays it is possible to produce ceramic parts with solid and complex shapes with rapid and efficient shaping and sintering techniques. In this paper, 3mol% yttria stabilized zirconia (3Y-TZP) dense and lattice parts were shaped by Digital light processing method (DLP) and densified by conventional (CV) and microwave (MW) sintering. 3Y-TZP samples were MW sintered up to 1550 degrees C with different heating rates (10, 30, and 50 degrees C/min) for the dense samples and 30 degrees C/min for the lattice samples. Controlled thermal cycles with a homogenous heating and no thermal runaway was reached. CV sintering was carried out at 10 degrees C/min up to 1550 degrees C. No inter -layer delamination was detected after sintering by the two methods. Both dense and lattice MW-sintered samples reached high final densities (equivalent to obtained values with CV-sintered samples, i.e., >= 98% T.D.), but exhibited a lower average grain size than CV-sintered materials. The different architectures between dense and lattice samples resulted in a different specific absorbed power: the power absorbed by the dense sample is lower than that absorbed by the lattice one meaning that this sample architecture heats up easily.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据