4.7 Article

Enzyme-based fluorometric biosensor-based on coffee waste-derived carbon dots modified with APBA and NADP plus cofactor for selective dual detection of γ-aminobutyric acid in in vitro and in vivo models

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 4356-4364

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.09.321

关键词

Enzyme-based sensor; Coffee waste-derived carbon dots; ?-aminobutyric acid; Intracellular sensing; Zebrafish; Human serum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An enzyme-based fluorescent sensor using carbon dots derived from coffee waste was developed for detecting inhibitory neurotransmitters like gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). The sensor showed a detection range of 0-20 mu M and a detection limit of 95.09 nM for GABA. It was able to detect GABA intracellularly and showed high recovery values for real samples such as human serum.
An enzyme-based fluorescent sensor was developed by adapting carbon dots derived from coffee waste to detect inhibitory neurotransmitters such as gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). In this study, CDs were synthesized from biomass-derived coffee waste by the facile hydrothermal reaction (i.e., C-CDs). A C-CDs-based enzyme-based sensor was then developed using 3-aminophenyl boronic acid (APBA) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP+) cofactors (i.e., C-CANs). As a result of the addition of the GABase enzyme, the resulting blue - fluorescent C-CANs were effective in detecting GABA. This sensor is capable of sensing GABA in the range of 0-20 mu M with a detection limit of 95.09 nM. A distinguished fluorescence quenching was observed in human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells where probe (C-CANs-GABase) was able to detect GABA intracellularly. Zebrafish larvae were used to study the sensing potentials of the developed probe against GABA at different concentrations (10 and 20 mu M). A validation study was conducted on real samples such as human serum, which showed high recovery values between 97 and 105.6%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据