4.7 Article

Hydrothermal synthesis of CuO/rGO nanosheets for enhanced gas sensing properties of ethanol

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 5595-5603

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.174

关键词

Copper oxide; Limit of detection; Hole accumulation layer; Synergistic effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CuO nanosheets and CuO/rGO nanocomposites were synthesized by one-step hydrothermal method and characterized. The CuO/rGO sensors showed significantly improved gas sensing performance for ethanol compared to the pure CuO sensor. The CuO/rGO-10 sensor exhibited the best gas sensing performance among the four sensors prepared, with an optimum working temperature 25 lower than that before doping, and its response value for 100 ppm ethanol at 175 degrees C was 10.54, which was 3.75 times higher than that before rGO doping. The CuO/rGO-10 sensor also demonstrated remarkable selectivity, reproducibility, and a limit of detection of 100 ppb for ethanol.
In this work, CuO nanosheets and CuO/rGO nanocomposites are synthesized by one-step hydrothermal method and characterized accordingly. Next, these samples are tested for gas sensing performance. The test data show that the CuO/rGO sensors have significantly improved gas sensing performance for ethanol compared to the pure CuO sensor. It should be noted that the CuO/rGO-10 sensor has the most outstanding gas sensing performance among the four sensors prepared, with an optimum working temperature 25 lower than that before doping, and its response value for 100 ppm ethanol at 175 degrees C is 10.54, which is 3.75 times higher than that before rGO doping. Also, the CuO/rGO-10 sensor has remarkable selectivity and reproducibility for ethanol. Most impor-tantly, its limit of detection for ethanol is 100 ppb. At last, the gas sensing mechanism of the composites for ethanol is explained. Enhanced gas sensing performance of CuO/rGO sensors for ethanol is attributed to the lamellar structure and the synergistic effect between CuO and rGO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据