4.7 Article

Comparing the luminescence properties of ZnAl2O4 synthesized by citrate-nitrate auto-combustion and solid-state synthesis routes

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 23, 页码 35606-35613

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.277

关键词

Thermoluminescence; Cathodoluminescence; Synthesis; Dose response; Dosimetry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study synthesized ZnAl2O4-based ceramic materials through two different synthesis methods and investigated their luminescent properties depending on morphology. The results showed that ceramic samples obtained using the solid-state synthesis method were more defective in morphology and exhibited higher thermoluminescence sensitivity. The optimal samples exhibited a linear thermoluminescence dependence over a wide absorbed dose range, indicating their potential as ionizing irradiation detectors.
Zinc aluminate (ZnAl2O4) is an attractive material for various applications such as catalysis, optics and lasers. Although this material can also be used as an irradiation detector, there is little information in the literature regarding its use in dosimetric applications. Therefore, the aim of this work is to obtain ZnAl2O4-based ceramic materials in order to study their luminescent properties depending on morphology. To realize this goal, we used two synthesis methods involving various sintering temperature regimes to obtain ceramics with a given microstructure. As compared to ceramic samples obtained by citrate-nitrate synthesis, those obtained using the solid-state synthesis method were found to be morphologically more defective, resulting in higher thermoluminescence sensitivity. In a final step, we investigated the possibility of using the obtained ZnAl2O4 ceramics in an absorbed dose detector. The optimal obtained samples were found to have a linear thermoluminescence dependence over a wide absorbed dose range of 0.05-60 Gy. The results of this work testify to the prospects of applying undoped zinc aluminate as an ionizing irradiation detector.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据