4.7 Article

Allelic variation in the Arabidopsis TNL CHS3/CSA1 immune receptor pair reveals two functional cell-death regulatory modes

期刊

CELL HOST & MICROBE
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 1701-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.09.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-1758400]
  2. HHMI
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea Fellowship - Ministry of Education [2014R1A6A3A03058629]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014R1A6A3A03058629] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals two cell-death regulatory modes for plant NLR immune receptors CHS3/CSA1 pairs, one mediated by the ID domain and the other relying on detecting perturbation of an associated co-receptor. The ancestral Arabidopsis CHS3/CSA1 pair likely gained a second recognition specificity and regulatory mechanism through ID acquisition while balancing selection maintains ID and non-ID alleles.
Some plant NLR immune receptors are encoded in head-to-head sensor-executor pairs that function together. Alleles of the NLR pair CHS3/CSA1 form three clades. The clade 1 sensor CHS3 contains an integrated domain (ID) with homology to regulatory domains, which is lacking in clades 2 and 3. In this study, we defined two cell-death regulatory modes for CHS3/CSA1 pairs. One is mediated by ID domain on clade 1 CHS3, and the other relies on CHS3/CSA1 pairs from all clades detecting perturbation of an associated pattern-recognition receptor (PRR) co-receptor. Our data support the hypothesis that an ancestral Arabidopsis CHS3/CSA1 pair gained a second recognition specificity and regulatory mechanism through ID acquisition while retaining its original specificity as a guard against PRR co-receptor perturbation. This likely comes with a cost, since both ID and non-ID alleles of the pair persist in diverse Arabidopsis populations through balancing selection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据