4.3 Article

What structures did, and did not, reveal about the function of the epithelial Ca2+ channels TRPV5 and TRPV6

期刊

CELL CALCIUM
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceca.2022.102620

关键词

TRPV5 channel; TRPV6 channel; Cryo electron microscopy; X ray crystallography; Structure-based drug design

资金

  1. NIH [R01GM093290, R01GM129357, R35GM144120]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 5 and 6 (TRPV5 and TRPV6) are Ca2+ selective epithelial ion channels that share high sequence homology due to recent gene duplication in mammals. Both channels are constitutively active and undergo Ca2+-induced inactivation, regulated by endogenous cofactors and binding of calmodulin. Recent cryo electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography structures provide detailed information for TRPV5 and TRPV6, focusing on their mechanisms of inhibition, activation, and modulation.
Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 5 and 6 (TRPV5 and TRPV6) are Ca2+ selective epithelial ion channels. They are the products of a relatively recent gene duplication in mammals, and have high sequence homology to each other. Their functional properties are also much more similar to each other than to other members of the TRPV subfamily. They are both constitutively active, and this activity depends on the endogenous cofactor phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P-2]. Both channels undergo Ca2+-induced inactivation, which is mediated by direct binding of the ubiquitous Ca2+ binding protein calmodulin (CaM) to the channels, and by a decrease in PI(4,5)P-2 levels by Ca2+-induced activation of phospholipase C (PLC). Recent cryo electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and X-ray crystallography structures provided detailed structural information for both TRPV5 and TRPV6. This review will discuss this structural information in the context of the function of these channels focusing on the mechanism of CaM inhibition, activation by PI(4,5)P-2 and binding of pharmacological modulators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据