4.6 Article

Desulfurization of heavy naphtha by oxidation-adsorption process using iron-promoted activated carbon and Cu+2-promoted zeolite 13X

期刊

CATALYSIS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 169, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2022.106473

关键词

Sulfur; Adsorbent; H2O2; CH2O2; Molecular sieve

资金

  1. Al-Mustaqbal University College

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the removal efficiency of sulfur compounds from heavy naphtha using oxidation and adsorption processes. IPAC showed superior performance in both oxidation and adsorption due to its physicochemical properties. The maximum desulfurization efficiency achieved was 97% for IPAC and 93% for CPZ13X, with adsorption capacities of 21.83 mg/g and 20.93 mg/g, respectively.
The removal efficiency of sulfur compounds from heavy naphtha with a sulfur concentration of 600 ppm was evaluated using a combination of oxidation and adsorption processes. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was used as an oxygenated agent. At the same time, iron-promoted activated carbon (IPAC) and Cu+2 promoted zeolite 13X (CPZ13X) were used in dual functions (catalysts for the oxidation reaction and adsorbents for sulfur compounds). This study explored the effect of several factors on desulfurization efficiency. These factors are the volume ratio of H2O2 to heavy naphtha (0.01-0.05), agitation speed (U-speed = 100-500 +/- 2 rpm), pH of heavy naphtha (1-5), the weight of solid materials (0.5-2.0 g), process temperature (290-360 +/- 1 K), and contact time (30-180 min). The outcomes show that IPAC is superior for the desulfurization process due to its better performance in oxidation and adsorption of sulfur compounds due to its physicochemical properties, such as its high surface area. The maximum desulfurization efficiency of IPAC and CPZ13X reached by this work were 97 and 93%, respectively. The adsorption capacity of IPAC and CPZ13X reached at the optimum conditions were 21.83 and 20.93 mg/g, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据