4.8 Article

Graphitization vs tribo-oxidation governing friction behaviors of doped graphene nanocrystalline carbon films

期刊

CARBON
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 435-443

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.07.001

关键词

Carbon film; Friction; Graphitization; Tribo-oxidation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52175179, 51975383]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2022A1515010555]
  3. Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program [JCYJ20210324100406018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides detailed analysis on the low friction behavior of doped GNC films and uncovers the contributions of graphitization and tribo-oxidation to the low friction mechanisms. The results suggest that graphitization and tribo-oxidation can be competitive or coexisting.
Graphitization and tribo-oxidation are two common phenomena found at the friction interfaces of carbon-based films in atmospheric environment. However, the specific contributions of them to the low friction behavior are not well clarified. Here, we show two kinds of low friction behaviors of graphene nanocrystalline carbon (GNC) films doped with different elements (Ti, Al, Si). The promotion effects of graphene nanocrystallites on the graphitization and different doping elements on the tribo-oxidation were detailed analyzed for uncovering the low friction mechanisms. The results suggest that the relationship between graphitization and tribo-oxidation could be competitive or coexisting. For competitive type, the friction coefficient of Ti-doped GNC film first decreased to a low-friction stage due to graphitization, and then gradually increased into a steady-friction stage by tribo-oxidation. For coexisting type, the graphitization and tribo-oxidation co-induced the steady-low-friction behaviors of Al-doped and Si-doped GNC films. This work provides new insights into the friction mechanism, and the guidance for the design of doped GNC films with desired friction behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据