4.8 Article

Spectroscopic investigation of improved corrosion resistance of nickel due to multilayer graphene coating developed with suitably tilted substrate during CVD

期刊

CARBON
卷 200, 期 -, 页码 215-226

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.08.054

关键词

Substrate orientation during CVD; Corrosion protection; Scanning X-ray photoelectron microscopy; Raman spectroscopy; Potentiodynamic polarisation; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

资金

  1. Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Monash University
  2. IITB-Monash Research Academy
  3. Monash Graduate School

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study establishes the theoretical basis for tailoring the orientation of the metallic substrate during the chemical vapour deposition process, resulting in improved uniformity and low defect content of the graphene coating. The corrosion resistance of nickel is considerably enhanced with the development of this multilayer graphene coating.
The great variability (from remarkable to little) in graphene's ability as a corrosion barrier coating is attributed to the extent of defects and non-uniformity of graphene. This study established the theoretical basis for tailoring the orientation of the metallic substrate with respect to the direction of flow of the incoming precursor gas into the reactor during the chemical vapour deposition (CVD) of uniform graphene film on the substrate. We validated the theoretical basis by demonstration of development of a multilayer graphene coating with considerably improved uniformity and low defect content on a suitably tilted nickel substrate during CVD that provided an effective and durable corrosion resistance to the metal in an aggressive acidic medium. Thorough scanning X-ray photoemission microscopy (SPEM) using synchrotron radiation and Raman spectroscopy enabled the mechanistic understanding of the improved uniformity and low defect content of graphene coating, and their role in considerably improving the corrosion resistance of nickel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据