4.7 Article

Nature-inspired construction of iridescent CNC/Nano-lignin films for UV resistance and ultra-fast humidity response

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 296, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119920

关键词

Cellulose nanocrystals; Lignin nanoparticles; Iridescent nanocomposites films; UV resistance; Biocompatibility

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province for Youth [BK20200797, BK20210622]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [32101468]
  3. State Key Labora- tory of Biobased Material and Green Papermaking, Qilu University of Technology, Shandong Academy of Sciences [GZKF202118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nature-inspired photonic films were developed by incorporating bio-based lignin nanoparticles into chiral nematic cellulose crystals, showing outstanding UV absorption capabilities, hydrophobicity, and cytocompatibility, with great potentials for various applications.
Exploration of functional materials based on sustainable and renewable biomolecules has been of much interest. Herein, nature-inspired photonic films were proposed by incorporation of bio-based lignin nanoparticles (LNPs) into chiral nematic cellulose crystals (CNCs). Evaporation induced self-assembly (EISA) formed oriented and layered structure of the nanocomposites iridescent films with enlarged helix pitches by intercalation of higher amounts of LNPs. Decreased crystallite sizes and expanding layer gaps indicated the homogeneous distribution and hydrophobic interactions between CNCs and LNPs. Distinguished UV absorption capabilities with over 90 % shielding capabilities in UVB region and increased hydrophobicity with the contact angle of 75 were achieved for the composite films due to the presence of hydrophobic lignin. The proposed optical films also showed outstanding cytocompatibility owing to all-natural components introduced into the materials, which may display great potentials in many fields such as stimuli sensing, anti-counterfeiting and wearable devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据