4.7 Article

Modified cellulose paper with photoluminescent acrylic copolymer nanoparticles containing fluorescein as pH-sensitive indicator

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 296, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119965

关键词

Fluorescent cellulose paper; Polymer nanoparticles; pH-sensitive; Fluorescein; Polyacrylic

资金

  1. Iran Polymer and Petro-chemical Institute [2207]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel fluorescein mono-acrylate (Flu-Ac) was synthesized and used to produce epoxy-functionalized latex nanoparticles. The obtained fluorescent cellulose paper showed enhanced emission intensity by increasing the pH of the solution. These findings suggest the potential of these fluorescent cellulose substrates for reusable indicators with pH sensing capabilities across a range of acidity or basicity.
Herein, novel fluorescein mono-acrylate (Flu-Ac) was synthesized and copolymerized with methyl methacrylate and glycidyl methacrylate to produce epoxy-functionalized latex nanoparticles. Fluorescent cellulose paper was then obtained by dip-coating and subsequent heat treatment. Synthesis of Flu-Ac, its incorporation efficiency into the epoxy-functionalized nanoparticles (almost 92 %), spherical morphology of the particles and their sizes (89-93 nm), and optical properties were studied comprehensively. SEM micrographs showed effective wetting of the cellulose fibers with uniform diffusion and deposition of the prepared functional nanoparticles through the establishment of physical and chemical interactions. Visual and spectroscopic emission intensity of the impregnated cellulose paper (lambda max of 529 nm) were enhanced by increasing pH of the solution (from 2 to14) as a consequence of the transformation of cationic fluorescein to its neutral and anionic form. These observations depicted that such fluorescent cellulose substrates could be exploited in reusable indicators with good ability for sensing pH of solutions with diverse acidity or basicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据