4.7 Article

Superinsulating nanocellulose aerogels: Effect of density and nanofiber alignment

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 292, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119675

关键词

Cellulose nanofibers; CNF; Aerogel; Thermal conductivity; SAXS; E modulus

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021_179000]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_179000] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellulose aerogels have the potential to be alternatives to silica aerogels with advantages in cost, sustainability, and mechanical properties. However, the density dependence of thermal conductivity for cellulose aerogels remains controversial. Experimental results show that the density of cellulose aerogels affects the thermal conductivity, with compressed aerogels having lower thermal conductivity due to the alignment of nanofibers.
Cellulose aemgels are potential alternatives to silica aerogels with advantages in cost, sustainability and mechanical properties. However, the density dependence of thermal conductivity (lambda) for cellulose aerogels remains controversial. Cellulose aerogels were produced by gas-phase pH induced gelation of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers (CNF) and supercritical drying. Their properties are evaluated by varying the CNF concentration (5-33 mg.cm(-3)) and by uniaxial compression (9-115 mg.cm(-3)). The aerogels are transparent with specific surface areas of similar to 400 m(2).g(-1), mesopore volumes of similar to 2 cm(3).g(-1) and a power-law dependence of the E-modulus (alpha similar to 1.53, and the highest reported E of similar to 1 MPa). The dataset confirms that A. displays a traditional U-shaped density dependence with a minimum of 18 mW.m(-1).K-1 at 0.065 g.cm(-3). For a given density, lambda is similar to 5 mW.m(-1).K-1 lower for compressed aerogels due to the alignment of nanofibers, confirmed by small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据