4.7 Article

Targeting FLT3-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells for acute lymphoblastic leukemia with KMT2A rearrangement

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 72, 期 4, 页码 957-968

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-022-03303-4

关键词

CAR T cell therapy; FLT3; piggyBac transposon; KMT2A gene rearrangement; Lineage switch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CD19-specific CAR T cell therapy is used for treating B-cell malignancies. However, relapse caused by antigen-escape has become a major concern. This study found that FLT3-specific CAR T cells showed antitumor efficacy against CD19-negative relapsed cases of KMT2A-r B-ALL, suggesting a promising treatment strategy.
CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) immunotherapy is used to treat B-cell malignancies. However, antigen-escape mediated relapse following CAR T therapy has emerged as a major concern. In some relapsed cases, especially KMT2A rearrangement-positive B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (KMT2A-r B-ALL), most of the B-cell antigens are lost via lineage conversion to the myeloid phenotype, rendering multi-B-cell-antigen-targeted CAR T cell therapy ineffective. Fms-related tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) is highly expressed in KMT2A-r B-ALL; therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of CAR T cells targeting both CD19 and FLT3 in KMT2A-r B-ALL cells. We developed piggyBac transposon-mediated CAR T cells targeting CD19, FLT3, or both (dual) and generated CD19-negative KMT2A-r B-ALL models through CRISPR-induced CD19 gene-knockout (KO). FLT3 CAR T cells showed antitumor efficacy against CD19-KO KMT2A-r B-ALL cells both in vitro and in vivo; dual-targeted CAR T cells showed cytotoxicity against wild-type (WT) and CD19-KO KMT2A-r B-ALL cells, whereas CD19 CAR T cells demonstrated cytotoxicity only against WT KMT2A-r B-ALL cells in vitro. Therefore, targeting FLT3-specific CAR T cells would be a promising strategy for KMT2A-r B-ALL cells even with CD19-negative relapsed cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据