4.4 Article

Thermal tolerance in cutthroat trout of the southern Rocky Mountains

期刊

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2021-0352

关键词

cutthroat trout; adaptive capacity; thermal tolerance; critical thermal maxima

资金

  1. Colorado's Species Conservation Trust Fund [SCTFW805]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the thermal tolerance of cutthroat trout fry from five populations and found significant differences in critical thermal maxima among populations and no significant differences in ultimate upper incipient lethal temperatures. Furthermore, adding a third-order term for temperature can improve model fit and reveal substantial differences in optimal growth temperatures.
With temperatures expected to rise across the southern Rocky Mountains, the ability of native fishes to tolerate stream warming has become a critical concern for those tasked with preserving coldwater species. We used common garden experiments to evaluate the thermal tolerance of cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii) fry from five populations important to managers representing three sub-species. Critical thermal maxima (CTMs) were evaluated through traditional exposure trials, while optimal growth and ultimate upper incipient lethal temperatures (UUILTs) were examined over the course of 21-day trials at six static temperature treatments. Whereas CTMs differed among populations (mean = 27.91 degrees C, SD = 0.35 degrees C), UUILTs did not (mean = 24.40 degrees C, SD = 0.04 degrees C). Comparison of cubic temperature-growth functions to the traditional quadratic functions showed that adding a third-order term for temperature can improve model fit, and revealed substantial differences in optimal growth temperatures (15.4-18.3 degrees C). Knowledge of these thermal tolerance thresholds will help to predict the consequences of a warming climate, identify suitable habitats for repatriation, and inform water quality temperature standards established to protect these fish into the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据