4.4 Article

The Geodetic Centroid (gCent) Catalog: Global Earthquake Monitoring with Satellite Imaging Geodesy

期刊

出版社

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0120220072

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Intragovernmental Personnel Agreement
  2. USGS Earthquake Hazards Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Remote sensing geodetic observations play an important role in earthquake monitoring and response, with the Geodetic Centroid (gCent) catalog introduced in this study. Analysis of 74 earthquakes using InSAR and optical observations shows that the centroid models compiled into the catalog are comparable to seismically inferred magnitudes. Limitations of the gCent catalog are highlighted due to remote sensing imaging constraints and simplified earthquake source descriptions.
Remote sensing geodetic observations (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar [InSAR] and optical correlation [pixel tracking]) serve an increasingly diverse and important role in earthquake monitoring and response. This study introduces the Geodetic Centroid (gCent) catalog-an earthquake catalog derived solely from space-based geodetic obser-vations-and analysis of 74 earthquakes (Mw 4.3-7.4) imaged from 1 August 2019 to 01 February 2022. For gCent, we use InSAR and optical correlation observations derived from the Sentinel-1 satellites and various publicly available optical satellites to systematically image all global earthquakes Mw 5.5 or larger and shallower than 25 km, Mw 7.0 or larger at any depth, and other high-impact earthquakes or seismic events of special interest. We invert surface displacements from successfully imaged earthquakes for the location, ori-entation, and dimensions of a single slipping fault patch that describes the centroid char-acteristics of the earthquake. These centroid models, in turn, are compiled into a catalog and used in U.S. Geological Survey/Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) operational earthquake response products such as ShakeMaps and finite-fault models. We provide a comparison of the gCent catalog to the ANSS Comprehensive Catalog and Global Centroid Moment Tensor (Global CMT) catalog to compare reported locations, depths, and magni-tudes. We find that global earthquake catalogs not only generally provide reasonably com-parable locations (within 10 km on average), but also they systematically overestimate depth that may have implications for earthquake shaking predictions based solely on earthquake origin information. Geodetic magnitudes are comparable to seismically inferred magnitudes, indicating that gCent models are unlikely to be systematically biased by the presence of postseismic deformation. We additionally highlight limitations of the gCent catalog induced by both the limitations of remote sensing imaging of earthquakes and our imposition of a simplified earthquake source description that does not include spatially distributed slip.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据