4.6 Article

InterMob: a 24-month randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of an intervention including behavioural change techniques and free transport versus an intervention including air pollution awareness-raising on car use reduction among regular car users living in Grenoble, France

期刊

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14099-4

关键词

Daily mobility; Spatial organisation; Psychology; Car use; Active mobility; Sustainable mobility; Behaviour change; Health; Air pollution; RCT

资金

  1. French National Research Agency [ANR-15-IDEX-02]
  2. IResP (Institute for public health research) [LI-CHALABAEV-AAP18-PREV-002]
  3. Ambition Research Pack 2019 of the Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes Region
  4. SMAAG
  5. Grenoble-Alpes Metropole

向作者/读者索取更多资源

InterMob is a randomized controlled trial that aims to reduce car use by implementing hard and soft levers. It evaluates the effectiveness of a six-month intervention in the short, mid, and long term, and explores the psychological processes, socio-economic, and geographical conditions of behavior change.
Background: Frequent car use contributes to health and environmental issues such as air pollution, climate change and obesity. Active and sustainable mobility (bike, walk, public transport, car sharing) may address these issues. Different strategies have been implemented in past research, involving hard levers, aimed at modifying the economical or geographical context (e.g., free public transport), and soft levers, aimed at modifying psychological processes (e.g., personalised transport advice). However, few studies have combined both hard and soft levers. In addition, few have used robust methodologies (e.g., randomised controlled trials), followed behavioural changes in the long-term, and been anchored in behaviour change theories. InterMob aims to address these limits by implementing a 24-month randomised controlled trial including hard and soft levers. The objectives of InterMob are to a) evaluate the effectiveness of an experimental arm versus an active controlled arm, and b) identify the processes of mobility change. Methods: Regular car users living in Grenoble (N=300) will be recruited and randomised to one of the two arms. The experimental arm consists in a six-month intervention combining hard levers (free access to transport/bikes), and soft levers (e.g., personalised transport advice). The control arm consists in a six-month intervention aimed at raising awareness on air pollution and its health effects. Both arms will include eight evaluation weeks (spread out over 24 months) based on a GPS, an accelerometer, and a pollution sensor. Moreover, participants will complete mobility logbooks and surveys measuring psychological constructs, socio-economical, and socio-spatial characteristics. Discussion: InterMob will assess the effectiveness of two interventions aimed at reducing car use within regular car users in the short-, mid- and long-term. Moreover, InterMob will allow to better understand the psychological processes of behaviour change, and the socio-economical and geographical conditions under which the intervention is efficient in reducing car use. Finally, the benefits of mobility change in terms of physical activity, quality of life, and exposure to pollution will be quantified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据