4.5 Review

Summarizing the effects of different exercise types in chronic low back pain - a systematic review of systematic reviews

期刊

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05722-x

关键词

Physiotherapy; Physical activity; Rehabilitation; Spinal pain; Training

资金

  1. Karolinska Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different types of common exercise used in chronic low back pain (CLBP) on pain and disability. The study found that the effects of various exercise types on pain and disability varied, but there were no major differences between exercise types. Many of the included systematic reviews had low-to-moderate quality and were based on randomized controlled trials with high risk of bias. The conflicting results undermine the certainty of the findings, leading to very low-to-moderate quality of evidence for the results. Future systematic reviews should focus on improving quality to minimize resource waste.
Background In chronic LBP (CLBP), guideline-endorsed treatment is to stay active, return to normal activity, and to exercise. Several reviews on various exercise types used in CLBP have been published. We aimed to identify systematic reviews of common exercise types used in CLBP, to appraise their quality, and to summarize and compare their effect on pain and disability. Methods We searched the databases OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE LIBRARY, and WEB OF SCIENCE (Core collection) for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on adults between 18 and 70 years of age suffering from chronic or recurrent LBP for a period of at least 12 weeks, which investigated the effects of exercises on pain and disability. All searches were conducted without language restriction. The search was performed up until 2022-01-26. The included reviews were grouped into nine exercise types: aerobic training, aquatic exercises, motor control exercises (MCE), resistance training, Pilates, sling exercises, traditional Chinese exercises (TCE), walking, and yoga. The study quality was assessed with AMSTAR-2. For each exercise type, a narrative analysis was performed, and the level of evidence for the effects of exercise was assessed through GRADE. Results Our database search resulted in 3,475 systematic reviews. Out of the 253 full texts that were screened, we included 45 systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The quality of the included reviews ranged from high to critically low. Due to large heterogeneity, no meta-analyses were performed. We found low-to-moderate evidence of mainly short-term and small beneficial effects on pain and disability for MCE, Pilates, resistance training, TCE, and yoga compared to no or minimal intervention. Conclusions Our findings show that the effect of various exercise types used in CLBP on pain and disability varies with no major difference between exercise types. Many of the included systematic reviews were of low-to-moderate quality and based on randomized controlled trials with high risk of bias. The conflicting results seen, undermine the certainty of the results leading to very-low-to-moderate quality of evidence for our results. Future systematic reviews should be of higher quality to minimize waste of resources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据