4.6 Review

Comparative efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network Meta-analysis

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10086-5

关键词

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Advanced or metastatic; Immunotherapy; Network meta-analysis

类别

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81874220]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2020A1515010030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the efficacy and safety of different immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The results showed that Toripalimab and Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy were likely to be the best options in the first-line setting, while Sintilimab and Camrelizumab were preferred options for refractory patients. The toxicity related to immunotherapy was manageable.
Background: The study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of various immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: We searched Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Clinical Trials.gov and several international conference databases from January 1, 2000 to December 19, 2021. We conducted Bayesian network meta-analysis to assess the relative effects among treatments. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate and adverse events. Results: Ten eligible trials with 5250 patients were included.Toripalimab and Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy were preferred to rank first on OS (probability, 61%) and PFS (probability, 37%) in the first-line setting, respectively. In refractory patients, Sintilimab and Camrlizumab were most likely to be ranked first on OS (probability, 37%) and PFS (probability, 94%). The toxicity related to immunotherapy was manageable in clinical trials. Camrelizumab and Nivolumab had the less adverse events of grade 3 or higher in the first and refractory setting, respectively. Conclusions: This study found that Toripalimab and Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy were likely to be the best option in terms of OS and PFS in the first-line setting for patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC respectively. Sintilimab and Camrelizumab were the preferred options for OS and PFS in refractory patients respectively. The toxicity of immunotherapy was different from conventional chemotherapy, but manageable in patients with ESCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据